Wow, I sometimes forget how much has changed between versions. Thanks for the response. Wes
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Klaus Post <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > Almost everything has been re-written, and images _will_ look different due > to new color profiles, new processing methods, etc. We have tried to keep it > as close as possible, but in many cases the difference will be visible. But > lets be honest 1.x images looked pretty awful if you didn't use an ICC > profile anyway ;) > > > Regards, Klaus Post > > http://www.klauspost.com > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 17:44, Wesley Leong <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello again, >> I had another question about compatibility between versions. I've been >> using the daily version for a little while now, and recently was going >> through some of my photos that were processed under the last stable release. >> I've noticed that the photos look different between the two versions (I >> pulled them up on both the stable and daily with the same settings). I'm >> assuming (let me know if I'm wrong) that there are some changes that were >> made to the latest version with contrast, saturation, etc, that is causing >> this, so that even with the same values the two versions will render it >> differently. Is there a way that my previously processed could be >> automatically adjusted to look the same (or close to) in the new version? >> >> Thanks, >> Wes >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Rawstudio-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Rawstudio-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-users > >
_______________________________________________ Rawstudio-users mailing list [email protected] http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-users
