Razor is an opinion based voting mechanism with a built-in voter trust rating system.
Nothing more, nothing less.
If you don't like the opinions, either vote, or suggest improvements, but making some kind of absurd, over-hyped censorship accusation is both unfounded and extraordinarily immature.
I do however agree with you, that it is useful to talk about ways to improve the accuracy of razor and it's trust systems. This is both intelligent and actually accomplishes something to solve the problem.
So what methods of improving the razor system do you propose? I really, honestly and truly, would like to hear some of your ideas about this. I do know you're smart enough to think about some of the side issues, despite the wording of your messages.
And please keep the tabloid headlines out of it, you'll just get people agitated and make yourself look less credible (if that's even possible at this point). You've got a long history over on SADev of making good points but over-sensationalizing the presentation to the point that you sound like a writer for the Enquirer (tm) and nobody's willing to listen to you in a technical forum as a result. Haven't you learned that such "hotbutton" tactics really don't lend credibility to your arguments in technical forums, and in fact, greatly damages it instead?
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
