I am the mail admin at a manufacturing corporation with about 2000 email users and 3500 messages a weekday.
 
Here is a two week sample of how razor v2 is doing at our corporation compared to other spam blocking mechanisms.  "Jammed" is a word recipe blocker and "SA" stands for SpamAssassin, threshold 5, no network checks.  "Blacklisted" checks the envelope sender and the "From:" address and supports regular expressions.  My Bayesian filter corpus is getting dated.  With an update, I think I could boost it 10% on average.
 
I review messages not caught by at least two filters.  Blacklisting counts as two filters.  About 50 to 100 messages a day are caught by just one filter.  I have about seven false positives a day from that 50 - 100 that are worth forwarding on to the recipient.  There are probably ten a day more false positives that aren't worth the e-paper they are printed on, so I pitch em and/or whitelist the sender so I don't get bothered further.
 
Razor is still a valuable filter at 40% (all parts must be spam).  I haven't had time to make these live and publically available as has been requested often, but I wanted to share.
 
 
Spam Statistics
Date Spam Count Jammed Razored Blacklisted Trollbox Bayesian SA
2003-03-03 936 166    (17.74%) 327    (34.94%) 321    (34.29%) 259    (27.67%) 756    (80.77%) 706    (75.43%)
2003-03-04 1390 232    (16.69%) 533    (38.35%) 517    (37.19%) 373    (26.83%) 1062    (76.40%) 1033    (74.32%)
2003-03-05 1204 204    (16.94%) 488    (40.53%) 367    (30.48%) 369    (30.65%) 979    (81.31%) 913    (75.83%)
2003-03-06 1111 174    (15.66%) 460    (41.40%) 370    (33.30%) 341    (30.69%) 864    (77.77%) 829    (74.62%)
2003-03-07 991 143    (14.43%) 432    (43.59%) 426    (42.99%) 275    (27.75%) 799    (80.63%) 709    (71.54%)
2003-03-08 762 130    (17.06%) 360    (47.24%) 248    (32.55%) 233    (30.58%) 678    (88.98%) 568    (74.54%)
2003-03-09 686 130    (18.95%) 320    (46.65%) 210    (30.61%) 244    (35.57%) 583    (84.99%) 523    (76.24%)
2003-03-10 1006 145    (14.41%) 380    (37.77%) 316    (31.41%) 262    (26.04%) 756    (75.15%) 737    (73.26%)
2003-03-11 1042 174    (16.70%) 395    (37.91%) 400    (38.39%) 273    (26.20%) 806    (77.35%) 767    (73.61%)
2003-03-12 1246 169    (13.56%) 465    (37.32%) 428    (34.35%) 388    (31.14%) 998    (80.10%) 892    (71.59%)
2003-03-13 1183 213    (18.01%) 453    (38.29%) 380    (32.12%) 373    (31.53%) 952    (80.47%) 849    (71.77%)
2003-03-14 973 176    (18.09%) 368    (37.82%) 368    (37.82%) 305    (31.35%) 824    (84.69%) 688    (70.71%)
2003-03-15 810 162    (20.00%) 350    (43.21%) 332    (40.99%) 269    (33.21%) 721    (89.01%) 547    (67.53%)
2003-03-16 691 115    (16.64%) 302    (43.70%) 243    (35.17%) 257    (37.19%) 605    (87.55%) 487    (70.48%)
2003-03-17 1004 228    (22.71%) 327    (32.57%) 385    (38.35%) 305    (30.38%) 796    (79.28%) 676    (67.33%)

Reply via email to