On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:02:35AM -0700, Kelson Vibber wrote: > At 07:07 AM 6/25/2003, Whit Blauvelt wrote: > >It's to the point where I'll > >need to look for another solution. Razor was plenty good enough until the > >last month or so. > > I'd suggest looking for an *additional* solution, rather than *another* > solution. In my experience, no one approach (blacklisting, content > analysis, content hashing, Bayesian classification, etc.) is anywhere near > as effective as combining several.
I'm sure that's true. But part of the reason it can feel good to use razor is in being able to help with the reports. If the discovery servers aren't available more often than not I just end up deleting spam rather than reporting it. The current discovery server problem - whether it's a bug in the Linux implementation or lacking capacity in the servers - is enough to doom razor if it keeps people from actually reporting spam to it. Something like this seems to be the case. I'm seeing 100 spams a day get through razor where it used to be about 20 - this to a long-established (and long-public) address. Whit ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
