We are using version 2.6.3. I have pasted our local.cf file below:
# This is the right place to customize your installation of SpamAssassin. # # See 'perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf' for details of what can be # tweaked. # ########################################################################### # # rewrite_subject 0 # report_safe 1 # trusted_networks 212.17.35. required_hits 5 score RAZOR2_CHECK 5
The line above is why you're getting a score of 5.0 for razor.
I think that scoring 5.0 for razor is GROSSLY inappropriate, despite Loinel's opinion.
I've had numerous false positive problems with razor over the years. This doesn't make it a bad tool, but it does make it not worth 5.0 points for any razor hit.
The current incarnation of razor 2.61 is having some occasional FP problems due to the relative youth of the whiplash signature database in being used with Razor. This should even out over time, but for right now it's causing some problems due to lack of enough data points to cause the reports and revokes to properly average out.
Fix your local.cf to not assign such an abusurd (and yes, I do feel it's completely absurd) score to RAZOR2_CHECK. The default score should be fine. If you start having FN problems, you can go back to over-riding scores, but I'd suggest going back to the defaults until you have a feel for how it all works.
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
