> Why would it? None of the razor engines has ever examined the headers, so > there would be no need to report them.
I did not know that, or I would not have asked. I assumed it did some extrapolation from the headers. > e1 (defunct) is a SHA1 hash of the whole message body (razor1 compatible) > e2 (defunct) is a SHA1 hash of each mime part > e3 (defunct) is a nilsimsa hash of each mime part > e4 is a SHA1 hash of a sub-set of each mime part. > e8 is based on data yanked out of URLs in the body > > (note: 2,3,4 also use some preprocessors on text sections to reduce html > garbage) What is the common method of handling identity for such a circumstance? In the pipe, in the aliases file I tried to give razor-report a -home=/etc/razor and -ident=/etc/razor/identity-public etc, etc, but I always get a bounce that reports: "more: Cannot read the identity file: /etc/razor/identity-public" But /etc/razor/identity-public is chmod 666 and the directory is readable aswell. Thank you. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 13. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ Razor-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/razor-users
