Hi,

a colleague of mine is rather skeptic towards bootstrapping and reproducible-builds.

E.g. he wrote

https://fy.blackhats.net.au/blog/html/2021/05/12/compiler_bootstrapping_can_we_trust_rust.html

and the effect can also be seen in his packaging such as
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/rust1.65
that ships with two gigabytes of bootstrap compiler binaries for various architectures instead of using our existing rust packages of version N-1 "because compilation takes twice as long".

He also once pointed me to
https://blog.cmpxchg8b.com/2020/07/you-dont-need-reproducible-builds.html

In the end, it would be useful to collect some well-worded / well-thought counter-arguments on r-b.o (if we don't have that already)

https://reproducible-builds.org/docs/buy-in/ could provide some input.

Any thoughts and/or volunteers?

Ciao
Bernhard M.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to