Bernie, Technically, you don't move indexes, your either PACK or RELOAD them.
A lot of effort and beta testing was involved to implement new PACK options in the latest and greatest 6.5++, Build:1.862xRT03. For complete details, read RBW65PP3.TXT or RBD65PP3.TXT. In reference to another pair of socks, I would suggest you may want to get more stock, because you are going to need them for the 5th Annual R:BASE Developers' Conference in April 2003. http://www.rbase.com/conference Very Best Regards, Razzak. At 11:47 AM 1/9/2003 -0500, Bernie Lis wrote:
Razzak, Are you saying that if I am moving indexes while someone is searching, that rbase is clever enough to find the correct index and pointers (could there exist a duplicate index while packing)? If so, that is amazing -- there goes another pair of socks. ----- Original Message ----- From: "A. Razzak Memon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 10:18 AM Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: WHERE/ORDER BY On Indexed Column ofSmallTableSLOW ... > > Bernie, > > No. It is NOT dangerous! > > Have you tried it? > > This is one of the ENHANCEMENTS in The Glorious R:BASE 2000 > (version 6.5++), Build:1.862xRT03 and higher. > > Enjoy the benefits of staying CURRENT!! > > Very Best Regards, > > Razzak. > > At 10:04 AM 1/9/2003 -0500, Bernie Lis wrote: > > >Razzak, > >Isn't this dangerous to pack indexes while the database is in use. Seems to > >me that some users could get incorrect results while packing. > >If this is true, why give us the ability to get into trouble. > > > >Bernie Lis > >Megabytes, Inc. > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "A. Razzak Memon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > or > > > PACK INDEX > > > > > > This will pack all the indices for currently connected > > > database, even in a Multi-User environment. > >
