Emmitt - would not SELECT ... WHERE COUNT = LAST not work for this? 

Emmitt Dove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>Albert,
>
>There are quite good uses for cursors without loops. �One place we use them 
>is trying to find the last value for invoice number in an application where 
>the invoice number is permanently bound within a 10000-number 
>range. �(Invoice number hits 19,999 for example and then reverts to 
>10,000.) �In this case a SCROLL cursor with a FETCH LAST works quite nicely 
>where SELECT (MAX(...)) would not.
>
>>Do you know, I have never used a cursor without a loop? I only use cursors 
>>to return individual items from a set of items one at a time. In other 
>>cases I SELECT ... INTO ... FROM ... WHERE ...
>>
>
>Emmitt Dove
>Manager, DairyPak Business Systems
>Blue Ridge Paper Products, Inc.
>40 Lindeman Drive
>Trumbull, CT �06611
>(203) 673-2231
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


-- 
Albert Berry
Full Time Consultant to
PSD Solutions
350 West Hubbard, Suite 210
Chicago, IL 60610
312-828-9253 Ext. 32


__________________________________________________________________
The NEW Netscape 7.0 browser is now available. Upgrade now! 
http://channels.netscape.com/ns/browsers/download.jsp 

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/

Reply via email to