----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jan Johansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 11:11 AM
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Property commands to select all in listbox?


> Mike,
>
> I requested an enhancement for Right-Clik in for the Variable-List-View.
> Perhaps if you suggested it also (considering the power of the
> Developer of the Year postion) maybe it will move forward. ;)
>
> Jan

   As I said previously, if an enhancement is being sought, you should ask for 
right click in all the edits, since it makes sense that the same issues are 
common to most of them (drop down combo doesn't seem like a candidate though).

  You can be sure that Razzak has seen this thread and if it's do-able and 
sensible, then be patient and wait for it to happen.



> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "MikeB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 8:34 PM
> Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Property commands to select all in listbox?
>
>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 2:41 PM
>> Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Property commands to select all in listbox?
>>
>>
>>> Yes we tried that; ctrl-A doesn't work.
>>
>> I have thought this over.
>>
>> If you were going to ask for an enhancement, I would ask for All the Edits 
>> and ListBox, etc to have Right-Click EEP.
>>
>> Right-Click gives you the opportunity to devise your own context CHOOSE 
>> using the Union ALL construct, allowing great flexibility for alternatives 
>> when you need a solution other than a click for selection.
>>
>>
>> Mike Byerley
>>
>> "We Cannot Approach or Discuss 'YES', Until we
>> Have A Complete And Thorough Understanding Of 'NO'"
>>
>>>>
>> Karen,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Have they tried CTRL-A while on the ListBox?
>>>>
>>>>  That is the standard way to SELECT ALL in windows.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  If this does not work in the scenario you described, perhaps an 
>>>> enhancement
>>>> request is in order.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Dennis McGrath
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> 


Reply via email to