Thanks Razzak, 
I will give it a try tonight.

-Bob

--
Thompson Technology Consultants 
LaPorte, IN 46350 
219-363-7441

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "A. Razzak Memon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

> At 07:02 PM 7/30/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
> 
> >RScope sees this table and reports : 
> > 
> >The width in two byte words of each row for table SYS_COMMENT_ID 
> >is set to 1 in the structure file. It should be within the range 
> >of 2 to 2100. 
> > 
> >Is this a valid table? 
> > 
> >Any thoughts? 
> 
> Bob, 
> 
> R:Scope 7.5 or R:Scope 7.6 can indeed fix this structural error. 
> 
> Here's how: 
> 
> With your reported error; 
> 
> The width in two byte words of each row for table SYS_COMMENT_ID 
> is set to 1 in the structure file. It should be within the range 
> of 2 to 2100; 
> 
> the problem is that the row size(s) for the SYS_COMMENTS table 
> is outside the valid range. 
> 
> To repair the corruption, 
> 
> 01. First make a backup copy of the database. 
> 
> 02. Launch R:Scope 7.5/7.6, and connect to the corrupted database. 
> 
> 03. From the menus, select "Fix" > "Columns" 
> 
> 04. Select "SYS_COMMENTS" from the list. 
> 
> 05. The available columns, SYS_COMMENT_ID and SYS_COMMENT will be 
> displayed. 
> 
> 06. Here, starting with SYS_COMMENT_ID, verify the following: 
> 
> Location in Row (2 Byte Words): 1 
> Data Type: 1 
> Length: 1 
> Scale: 0 
> 
> 07. If any values are different than what is listed above, 
> make the appropriate changes and save the changes. 
> 
> 08. Next, viewing SYS_COMMENT, verify the following: 
> 
> Location in Row (2 Byte Words): 3 
> Data Type: 8 
> Length: 1 
> Scale: 0 
> 
> 09. If any values are different than what is listed above, 
> make the appropriate changes and save the changes. 
> 
> 10. Now, run the "Check Structure" options in R:Scope for 
> the SYS_COMMENTS table. Zero errors should be reported. 
> 
> 11. Lastly, to verify the entire database integrity, check 
> all the tables. 
> 
> That's all there is to it! 
> 
> Very Best R:egards, 
> 
> Razzak. 
> 
> 

Reply via email to