"Having said that, applying available updates and keeping yourself current will be much easier and idiot-proof, with built-in widgets in the "Official Release Version" of R:BASE eXtreme 9.0 (32/64)."
Razzak/or list- I bet I could still break it. But are we/you talking about the RBInstaller that the RBDesigner (me) using or RBTI (what I get from RBTI) to install with. Like updates etc... I have RBInstaller/Compiler and am wondering. Not sure how it applies to 9.0? but still curious. Paul -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of A. Razzak Memon Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 11:09 AM To: RBASE-L Mailing List Subject: [RBASE-L] - R:BASE Installers and Updates (was Re: I/O error redux) At 10:22 AM 2/5/2010, Karen Tellef wrote: >Razzak: Maybe I should submit this somewhere... But I think that >all the "multiple dll copy" situations arise because people apply >the updates differently than the original installation (typical vs. >server). > >This would be greatly diminished if, in the original installation, >you could indicate which you wanted! And if you wanted "server" >you wouldn't have to manually move files around. Since the update >comes with the option to choose, can't the original install? Upcoming version of "R:BASE Installer" http://www.rbinstaller.com will include all necessary options. >Boy, if the program could be really smart, the update would check >to see if the dlls are in the windows directory or not and >automatically choose server install (and vice versa). Currently distributed "R:BASE Updater" http://www.rbupdater.com used for all R:BASE updates, does include built-in intelligence to: Select Folder: . Read Installation (Default) . Read Last Executed EXE Folder Update Type: . Typical Update . Server Update Having said that, applying available updates and keeping yourself current will be much easier and idiot-proof, with built-in widgets in the "Official Release Version" of R:BASE eXtreme 9.0 (32/64). Very Best R:egards, Razzak.
