I have been running with option 1 for years. The compiled app is only 6 megs so 
it loads in less than a blink of an eye over our gigabit network. If you are 
not running gigabit I would do it. it is very cheap nowadays to do. Rbase fly's 
over gigabit.

I have never seen any message about the exe being safe. If you Google it, it 
will tell you how to turn off the message if you get it. 

If you go with option 2 you will need to copy that app to each machine every 
time you update it.

Dan Goldberg



From: jan johansen 
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 2:43 PM
To: RBASE-L Mailing List 
Subject: [RBASE-L] - compiled app
Looking for some feedback.

I have been using the compiler for years but am looking at my configuration.
There are 2 basic ways to use this on a server.

1. Compile the app to an EXE an place it on a server

Pros
Ease of maintenance and distribution
Pathing is easy (put a shortcut on a machine with the "start in" for the server 
which allows easy access to subfolders)

Cons
The app has to be pulled across the network each time and answer the question 
"is this exe safe?"

2. Compile the app and place it on each machine
Pros
App on machine. Only data is transfered (especially if you put your forms in 
the EXE)
No security question

Cons
Pathing to subfolders of database is more difficult

I would really like suggestions on solving the con of option 2.

TIA

Jan

Reply via email to