Big High Five from over here!!!   Glad it worked!

Karen

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: ttc.inc <[email protected]>
To: karentellef <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, Aug 25, 2015 6:53 am
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Button EEP versus Timer EEP


 
  
I changed the code from a CFA to a Run Select and everything ran perfectly last 
night.   
  
   
I did a cut and paste of the code into the VarChar column, so there were no 
changes  
   
in the operating code at all.  
   
   
   
Replaced the Property command with a Run Select and this morning all was good.  
   
   
   
Not sure what the difference is.   I have in the past and have now, other apps 
that  
   
use the form timer eep and CFA,s and they do not seem to have any issue.   
However,  
   
those CFA's have 1/4 the lines of code and no Delcare / While statements.  
Perhaps   
   
a connection?  
   
   
   
Truthfully, I assumed that a CFA was pretty much a Run Select command just 
build  
   
into the form designer.    
   
   
   
Thanks to all who submitted ideas.  
   
   
   
-Bob  
   
   
  
   
   
   From: "MikeB" <[email protected]>   
   To: "ttc inc" <[email protected]>   
   Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 2:03:19 PM   
   Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Button EEP versus Timer EEP   
    
    
   
Let's wait to see what happens with the Run Select before jumping out of the 
boat.   
    
    
   
> -----Original Message-----   
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Karen   
> Tellef   
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 2:10 PM   
> To: [email protected]   
> Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Button EEP versus Timer EEP   
>    
> Javier:  I've seen Bob's app before, and it's a cool front-end type of   
> form with lots of data for the users to see.  The timer updates some of   
> the data on the form.   
> Let me think, if a scheduled task ran an "outside" RBase program, I   
> guess it's possible that that program could dump the display data into   
> a lookup type of table, and could still have a timer on the form that   
> would gather and recalc the   
> display.   The form could have a "date last ran" / "date next run" so   
> the user has   
> some feedback on the process.  A bit of work, but it would take the   
> form out of the equation, wouldn't it?   
>    
>    
> Karen   
>    
>   
 

Reply via email to