Albert the way I think about it is, RUN SELECT is when I want to use it and a 
Stored Procedure is used all the time.

 

Buddy

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Albert
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 11:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [RBASE-L] - RUN SELECT or Stored Procedure?

 

Glad that the RUN SELECT worked for you! 

My head cannot get itself around any difference between a RUN SELECT and a 
Stored Procedure. Has anyone any idea when one is better than the other?

Albert

On 2015-08-25 8:06 AM, [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  wrote:

CFA was for Custom Form Action.   It is not related to compiling.   You can 
look in help 
under CUSTOM and see the options for Custom Form Actions.

 

A CFA is basically an stored EEP that one can access multiple times from 
multiple places

in a form without duplicating the code lines.  One could also think of it as a 
stored procedure

that is related only to the current form.  

 

The CFA is called with the PROPERTY command such as :

 

PROPERTY RBASE_FORM_ACTION <CustomFormActionCommandName> <parameters>

 

It is a very handy tool so one can avoid duplicating code in multiple 
locations.   This way, when

the code does need changed, you only have to change it in one location,

 

-Bob

 


  _____  


From: "Dan Goldberg"  <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
To: "ttc inc"  <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 8:26:40 AM
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Button EEP versus Timer EEP

 

Is a CFA a compiled form application? What was the property command?

 

Just want to make sure I note this in the future.

 

Thx

 

Dan Goldberg

 

From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  [mailto:[email protected]] 
On Behalf Of Karen Tellef
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 5:57 AM
To: Dan Goldberg
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Button EEP versus Timer EEP

 

Big High Five from over here!!!   Glad it worked!

Karen

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: ttc.inc <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
To: karentellef <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >
Sent: Tue, Aug 25, 2015 6:53 am
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Button EEP versus Timer EEP

I changed the code from a CFA to a Run Select and everything ran perfectly last 
night. 

I did a cut and paste of the code into the VarChar column, so there were no 
changes 

in the operating code at all. 

  

Replaced the Property command with a Run Select and this morning all was good. 

  

Not sure what the difference is.   I have in the past and have now, other apps 
that 

use the form timer eep and CFA,s and they do not seem to have any issue.   
However, 

those CFA's have 1/4 the lines of code and no Delcare / While statements.  
Perhaps 

a connection? 

  

Truthfully, I assumed that a CFA was pretty much a Run Select command just 
build 

into the form designer.  

  

Thanks to all who submitted ideas. 

  

-Bob 

 


  _____  


From: "MikeB" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 
To: "ttc inc" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > 
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 2:03:19 PM 
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Button EEP versus Timer EEP 

 

Let's wait to see what happens with the Run Select before jumping out of the 
boat. 

 

> -----Original Message----- 
> From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Karen 
> Tellef 
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 2:10 PM 
> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
> Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Button EEP versus Timer EEP 
> 
> Javier:  I've seen Bob's app before, and it's a cool front-end type of 
> form with lots of data for the users to see.  The timer updates some of 
> the data on the form. 
> Let me think, if a scheduled task ran an "outside" RBase program, I 
> guess it's possible that that program could dump the display data into 
> a lookup type of table, and could still have a timer on the form that 
> would gather and recalc the 
> display.   The form could have a "date last ran" / "date next run" so 
> the user has 
> some feedback on the process.  A bit of work, but it would take the 
> form out of the equation, wouldn't it? 
> 
> 
> Karen 
> 
> 

 

 

Reply via email to