Not a Bad Idea there Mike, but what if you 
have different settings for differenct users?

I know I have different users with different
screen size settings and this would present
some difficulties..

RBTI would have to set this up for single 
capability or multi-user capabilty.. 

Are you saying that this should be a copyable
database that would be say named different for
every user, or one that would hold a users settins 
in which their would have to be some kind of setup
capabilty or ??? 

Jim Limburg

MikeB wrote:
> 
> Here is a novel idea.  How about a small RBase database that would be
> STANDARDIZED to contain startup paramaters and kept in the Executible folder
> and would be read on startup by the engine. An RBase Exclusive Registry.
> After all, the Registry is no more than that. Just another Database.
> 
> mike
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nicky Avery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Placement of RBASE.CFG and RBASe.INI files
> 
> >
> > I'm sure there is a reason why we are able to specify in Preferences
> > where RBASE.CFG lives and then have it ignored while R:Base goes out
> > trawling every partition in sight for other vintages but I'm not sure
> > what it is. I believe it would be more convenient if we were able to
> > specify in R:Base's setup where to find both RBASE.CFG and RBASE.INI and
> > then have RBase accept the locations.
> >
> > I'd like to add my voice to the chorus that using the registry is a poor
> > idea. I am not sure I see the point of trying to produce a solid
> > application and then making it hostage to a fragile rats' nest subject
> > to invasion by every spyware and junkware program.
> >
> > $0.02
> >
> > Nicky
> >
> >

Reply via email to