> You're probably right, but that doesn't speak to the
> cause.  I use 
> unions a _lot_ and would like to know that I'm using
> them correctly. 
> It looks like I'll have to exclude "all" from the
> union operator as a 
> matter of course.

My goal is to try to figure out where the problem is
being introduced.  If UNIONing two views, rather than
two SELECTs, makes the problem go away, then there is
probably some problem in the way the two SELECTs are
written in context of a UNION SELECT (which could be a
problem in the way you wrote the view, or could be
something broken in the way the select is parsed).  If
it _doesn't_ cause the problem to go away, I would
think that there is definitely something amiss in the
internals which you would want to report to RDCC.
--
Larry 

__________________________________________________
Yahoo! - We Remember
9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost
http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute
================================================
TO SEE MESSAGE POSTING GUIDELINES:
Send a plain text email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the message body, put just two words: INTRO rbase-l
================================================
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the message body, put just two words: UNSUBSCRIBE rbase-l
================================================
TO SEARCH ARCHIVES:
http://www.mail-archive.com/rbase-l%40sonetmail.com/

Reply via email to