It seems that something like Property Rbase_Application_Action would be
nice to have in those situations.  It would be like Property
Rbase_Form_Action except it could be used through the application.

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alastair
Burr
Posted At: Friday, December 03, 2004 1:55 AM
Posted To: RB7-L
Conversation: [RBG7-L] - Re: Conversion guidelines
Subject: [RBG7-L] - Re: Conversion guidelines


Karen,
 
I have begun to use the custom EEPs on forms as I make changes and
improvements. Generally, I find that it is the sensible way to do
things.
 
However, there are exceptions, the main one that I have found is when
the same EEP is used by a number of controls/forms. I would much rather
edit the one external EEP than search for and edit all the custom ones.
 
The old DOS-type forms were much easier to search through and edit
outside of the designer - albeit with a _lot_ of care and backups! -
than the new Window's type are. But the Window-type forms are much
nicer.
 
Nevertheless, a simple way to "see" what EEPs, etc., that forms contain
would make life a whole lot easier - especially as forms are now the
basis for so much more than in the past.
 
Regards,
Alastair.
 
 

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        To: RBG7-L Mailing List <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
        Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 12:57 AM
        Subject: [RBG7-L] - Re: Conversion guidelines

        When Dennis mentioned this, it reminded me of a question I'd
been 
        meaning to ask.  I understand why you'd want to have "custom
code" 
        in the forms rather than a whole bunch of .rmd and .eep programs
out 
        there.  But I'm not 100% sure I want to go that way, and here's
why. 
        
        I couldn't count the number of times that I had to change a
column 
        name or change its type, or was asked a question of where are
all 
        the places where we update a table in code, etc.   With search
utilities 
        it's very easy to search all your .rmd and .eep programs for
occurrences 
        of certain words.  With all the code in a form, the only thing
you could do 
        is search the forms table where the data contains your word, and
you'd 
        get a list of forms but you would have to check every control to
find where 
        it might appear in the custom code!  Even if you put every
single piece of 
        code in the "custom form actions" (how many of you are using
this feature?), 
        you would still have to bring up each procedure one at a time to
search 
        for the word. 
        
        I suppose you could use that trick from the fall conference to
produce a .txt file 
        of all the code "behind the scenes" that makes up the form.
Those .txt files 
        would be searchable and it does contain custom code, albeit in a
slightly 
        altered fashion.   
        
        Does anyone consider this a problem, enough that they would
continue to 
        use external files, or do they document forms in a searchable
fashion? 
        
        
        Karen 
        
        
        
        
        
        

                1. I have moved virtual all of my code in snippets to
objects in the Design 
                Menu Bar option. It's clean, sometimes redundant, but
certainly makes 
                debugging easier. Are there any "tilt" or performance
issues to worry 
                about? I realize that it all goes into file 4 and I'm
interested in any 
                short or long term pros and cons. 
                


        
        

Reply via email to