On 05/28/10 14:35, Donald Eastlake wrote: > Perhaps I wasn't clear. We are trying to decide right now whether the > now split out TRILL IS-IS draft should have MGROUP in it, since MGROUP > has been in isis-layer2 for some time, or we should drop MGROUP since > some TRILL WG participants including Radia oppose MGROUP... do you > have an opinion on this?
>From reading the list archives on the topic, I agree with the WG participants opposed to a new IS-IS PDU type for multicast groups. Rishi _______________________________________________ rbridges-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridges-dev
