First let me say that the Hillborne is an awesome looking bike and
seems to have incredible versatility.     It is truly a unique bike!


What I'm wondering about is the sparse sizing available for
Rivendell's expanded geometry frames, such as the Hillborne.   As I
understand it, the reasoning behind offering fewer sizes of these
frames is that one size will fit a wider range of PBHs.    However, it
seems to me that the upsloping top-tube should not actually add any
versatility in terms of fit, because the numbers that matter in sizing
a bike are not actually affected by it.


Specifically, I think that given a particular BB drop and seat-tube
angle, the two *main* numbers that matter in how comfortable a bike
will be are (1) how high the handle bars are and (2) how long the top
tube is*.   For a given rider, their chosen seat height is not going
to change no matter how tall the seat-tube is, unless of course the
seat-tube exceeds their seat height.    So in 'normal' frame fitting,
the 2 cm seat-tube size intervals for a particular model are really
allowing the rider to choose their base handlebar height and handlebar
distance, to be fine-tuned with stem length etc.     Perhaps it would
make more sense if the industry had chosen head-tube length/TT length
rather than seat-tube length as the number indicating frame size(?)


Anyway, in offering only 4 sizes of a frame for the Sam Hillborne, you
are really only getting 4 choices of base-handlebar height (not
including the bounded, yet infinite number of positions you can adjust
a quill stem) and top-tube length.   If those are the most important
measurements in fitting a frame, I wonder if the wider-range thing
really holds true.


Just to clarify, I'm not criticizing Rivendell at all for only
offering 4 sizes of the Hillborne frame.   Also, I know NOTHING about
frame design next to Grant Petersen and the folks at Rivendell.     Of
course I realize that it makes sense from an economical point of view
to limit the sizes of this frame--   however, it still does not make
sense to me that one of these frames will fit a wider range of riders,
any more or less than a frame with a standard geometry.


Matt
Admiring the Hillorne but just wondering



*this is assuming typical head-tube angles, rake, cs length, etc, and
of course a comfortable seat.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to