Yes, 28 was considered huge! Now anything <38mm seems downright quaint! On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Cyclofiend Jim <cyclofi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ha! Yeah... and that seemed like a "big" tire... > > But remember - a lot of this was driven by other factors: > - Brake reach and clearance > - Lack of decent tires in that size range > > On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 7:54:03 PM UTC-7, cyclot...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Remember Rivendells that only had clearance for 28-32mm tires! >> That seems like a BCE funerary object you would find in an Etruscan tomb! >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Cheers, David Member, Supreme Council of Cyberspace "it isn't a contest. Just enjoy the ride." - Seth Vidal -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
