Width wise, does anyone know which Rivet has similar sit bone measurements to the SAs?
On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 8:55:12 PM UTC-4, Bill M. wrote: > > I was an early adopter, having bought a brown Pearl Ti from Deb at their > debut at NAHBS in Sacramento a few years ago. It has been in continuous > use since then and I like it a lot. It fits me better than a Brooks (of > which I own five of various models and vintages, none of them being used > right now) due to being wide enough at the sit bones but narrow in the nose > so I don't get thigh rub. The Rivet leather is quite hard, mine has hardly > stretched at all and seems like it will last a very long time. The comfort > is all from the shape, don't expect much cush. > > The SA is quite different. You can't expect it to keep a flat shape like > a Brooks or Rivet, it's meant to be a hammock and tensioning it flat will > just stretch it to death as many have found. My SA lives on a bike with a > fairly upright position and it works well enough for me like that. I can't > really ride on the SA in any kind of tuck. > > Bill > > On Saturday, October 24, 2015 at 1:20:04 PM UTC-7, Daniel Jackson wrote: >> >> Anybody have any experience with them? Thoughts? >> >> Thanks, >> D. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
