What's to gain? No oil and 4 years between changes of belt vs 1 year per chain. Is that really enough to justify the known and possible costs:
What's to lose? Cash for conversion. Your Quickbeam. Or the feel of your Quickbeam. "a carbon belt seems to make a lot of sense over a chain" Then buy a bike specifically designed for a carbon belt. In my experience things trying to be what they aren't rarely goes well. Let the QB be the QB, and the belt bike be the belt bike. In the two years I've owned my Quickbeam I've become a much stronger rider because of the QB's "limits." Spring is long country road time for me (single track is still melting till June), and my engine got a lot stronger on the QB, doing rides of 90+ miles. I'm curious to see if my engine has upgraded this year. Grin. With abandon, Patrick On Tuesday, March 1, 2016 at 10:01:00 AM UTC-7, sanjoser wrote: > > I'm once again considering having my Quickbeam modified to use a belt > drive. I saw > a ton of them at NAHBS and a carbon belt seems to make a lot of sense over > a chain. > I suspect that the frame modification will be major. > Does anyone have any advice on this? > > best > tom s. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
