I have a C17 on my Appaloosa and it really does not agree with me.  I 
bought the Cambium because I thought it would be more durable in the snow 
and rain.  As it turns out, the cotton outer layer absorbs water, whereas 
with a leather saddle you can just wipe it off in one second (or keep it 
covered).  I have a vintage B67 that I brought back to life with proofide 
and a B17 select on other bikes.  The B17 select is the comfiest of the 
lot.  I'm going to buy another Brooks soon because I broke the nose of the 
B67 (after 5+ years of daily, very hard use and abuse), and I think I'm 
going to go with one with the springs.

I don't mean to trash the product, but I found almost nothing in common 
between the B17 and C17 other than the name brand.  




On Monday, June 13, 2016 at 11:45:35 AM UTC-4, Joe Bernard wrote:
>
> I know there was a flurry of reviews when these first hit the market, but 
> I'm curious how folks are getting along with them now that time/miles have 
> passed. The only saddle I can ride more than 15 miles is the Brooks B17, 
> and I'm thinking of trying the Cambium C17 when my mustard CLEM comes in. 
>
> Also, are the rails longer? The rails on my new-to-me ti B17 are longer 
> than the steel ones..I'm wondering of they made that change on the Cambiums.
>
> Thanks, 
> Joe Bernard
> Vallejo, CA.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to