On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Seth Vidal <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:43 PM, rperks <[email protected]> wrote: > > The way I figure extra meta data in the database of the univererse is > > not really a bad thing. For only an extra few clicks you get a little > > more coverage for the objects of our attention. Better coverage at a > > minimum is just that, and if it leads to growth of our numbers, > > possible sales for Grant, etc. then it is only a good thing, no? > > > > The increased meta data and cross referencing may or may not also > > enhance search result optimization outside of the flickr pages. > > > > It just means I have to sift through N groups( where N is a number > steadily expanding as riv introduces new models) as opposed to going > through only 1. > > <shrug> not the end of the world and nothing to get upset about - just > thought I'd ask. > > thanks, > > -sv > > Just don't forget the most special-ist Rivendell group: http://www.flickr.com/groups/rivendell_valve_stems/ -- Cheers, David Redlands, CA "Bicycling is a big part of the future. It has to be. There is something wrong with a society that drives a car to workout in a gym." ~Bill Nye, scientist guy--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
