Bob, I too have a 89cm PBH. I cannot imagine why we would choose to ride a 57cm. When I ordered a custom road frame, Grant put me on a 61.5cm. Here it is many years ago with the handlebars at saddle height. https://www.flickr.com/photos/79695460@N00/6897752730/in/album-72157607471577085/ When I bought a Legolas, I chose a 62cm frame. https://www.flickr.com/photos/79695460@N00/5598979996/in/album-72157607471577085/ A 60cm Quickbeam looks like this https://www.flickr.com/photos/79695460@N00/2760281945/in/album-72157607471577085/ A 58cm frame with a completely flat top tube but a 2cm head tube extension looks like this. https://www.flickr.com/photos/79695460@N00/5265783630/in/album-72157607471577085/
Joe in GJT On Friday, December 8, 2017 at 10:31:07 AM UTC-7, Bob Lovejoy wrote: > I am right at the transition point between the 57cm and 61cm Roadini's > (PBH 89cm, seat height 78-79 depending on shoes). > > Can someone point me to pictures of a 61cm Roadini that has the saddle > height (as pictured) listed? I suppose the same goes for pictures of a > 57cm version, though I have seen some pictures posted and those have been > helpful. > > I tend to choose and ride frames on the larger side of any > recommendations, as I am used to it and also prefer a mostly level > saddle-to-bars relationship without being crazy with seat post or stem. > That said, the relatively higher head tube on the Roadini has me thinking. > > I will go back and study the geometry diagrams again but any pictures of > builds would be helpful. > > Thanks for any and all help, > > Bob Lovejoy > Galesburg, IL > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
