Eamon, Seems like 89-90pbh is somewhat the new dividing line in the recent sizing, at least with the Roadini, Homer, Atlantis, the Appaloosa and Clem H. I have an 89pbh as well, ride a 58cm Appaloosa, and am thinking (maybe very fuzzy, optimistic thinking) I would want a 61.5cm Homer as primarily a road bike, with a little gravel thrown in, with the caveat that I prefer a slightly larger frame (relative to the norm) versus slightly smaller. I would also probably run 700x38's, hopefully knocking the max SO height down just a fraction.
Facts, pictures and others' experiences could certainly push me the other way. I'll keep watching, reading, and hoping at least a few more measurements make it out to the masses. A great looking bike though... I will be excited to hear more! Bob On Monday, April 30, 2018 at 2:35:48 PM UTC-5, Eamon Nordquist wrote: > > New Homer looks good. It looks like there is a little extra top tube > upslope, and a little more chainstay length without becoming one of the > long bikes. Not knocking the long bikes - I have no doubt they ride great > and I hope they sell a ton of 'em. They are just too long to work for ME > for practical reasons. I think the new Homer looks like a winner. Looks > like I'd probably be a 58 in the version (89 pbh). > > Eamon > Seattle > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
