I measured last night - my 650B size 52 Bombadil has 47cm chainstays as opposed to the 45cm listed on the geometry chart in another post today - almost an inch longer.
Laing Cocoa, FL On Wednesday, June 13, 2018 at 4:42:28 PM UTC-4, Kieran J wrote: > Interesting. In photos, Bomba rear wheels have always looked more "tucked" > than other models. I've always assumed the Bomba was a pretty ideal > all-round trail machine (perhaps barring a slight increase in tire > clearance and certainly minus the second TT, which I oppose in all but the > most extreme use-case scenarios). > > KJ > > > On Wednesday, June 13, 2018 at 1:25:15 PM UTC-7, lconley wrote: >> >> Depends on the Bombadil. I have a "newer" Bombadil that has relatively >> long chainstays as well as a diagatube and tentacles. The chainstays are >> longer than what are listed on the Bombadil geometry chart, which I believe >> applies to the earlier "original" Bombadils which had double top tubes in >> the larger sizes instead of the diagatube. >> >> Laing >> >> >> On Wednesday, June 13, 2018 at 4:02:29 PM UTC-4, Kieran J wrote: >> >>> Didn't the Bombadil have relatively short ones? >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
