Similarly, I'm 6'3.5", and I'm pretty happy with 64 cm Atlantis, but I don't consider it a full-on dirt bike, but I do take it in the dirt a lot.
I have short legs for my height and keep my seat no higher than 81 cm above the center of the BB. I'm considering a Hunqapillar as my dedicated mountain bike with wide knobbies on it at all times and probably bullmoose bars and a mountain triple with a 12-36 in the back. As such, I am wondering if the 58 cm would be just the size I want. I'll talk to the guys at Rivendell if I really get serious about this, but I just wanted to share. There aren't any geometry charts yet, are there? -Jim W. p.s. As for the appearance, I think it looks pretty good in the photo, built up, and without paint. With paint, it's gonna be beautiful. -----Original Message----- >From: Shaun Meehan <meehan.sh...@gmail.com> >Sent: Mar 11, 2010 9:19 AM >To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com >Subject: Re: [RBW] More Hunka news > >I'd be curious to know what the seat height is set at on the 62cm bike >as it's pictured. Just to get an idea of how the "expanded" frames >compare to the traditionally configured frames size-wise. My seat >height is ~34" and I'm curious if a 62cm Hunqa would fit me. I have no >doubt that a 64cm Bomba would be a great fit. > >Shaun Meehan > >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW >Owners Bunch" group. >To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >For more options, visit this group at >http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
