Hi Richard, Happy new year! Hope all is good with you and yours, doing good over here.
Thanks for that easy math addition. 62 cm stack is up there for sure. Very few bike frames outside of maybe a Fargo get that kind of stack height sure there some others tho. Definitely and upside for Rivendell frames. Let's plan a ride in 2020. Hugh On Friday, January 10, 2020 at 10:29:06 PM UTC-8, Richard Rios wrote: > > Hey Hugh, > > Hope all is good. Just as a general observation I find adding the degree > by which the top tube upslopes to the seat tube length gets ya pretty > close. Not sure why Riv hasn't gone to sizing by stack rather than seat > tube. I think the stack gives a better idea of how the bike will really > fit. Man I miss my 56 Sam Hillborne with around 62 stack height. Bars got > up there nice and comfy without a ton of stem sticking out. Any way maybe > it's just so people can handle a smaller larger size. What, I ride a 52 > Clem that's so big. If ya tell someone it fits kinda like a 58/9 🤯. > > Best, > Richard -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/eef8fd3c-170a-4aee-bba9-1bcdc7ef4163%40googlegroups.com.
