They made the Atlantis both before and after the Hunqapillar (and Bombadil). The Hunqapillar was basically a lower cost Bombadil when first introduced. I would say that the Gus/Susie is the successor to the Bombadil/Hunqapillar.
When I inquired about getting an Atlantis years ago, Riv recommended the Hunquapillar because of my weight for use as a touring bike. Later, a brand new Bombadil frame in my size (52) appeared on the website as a frame special for 40% off over the Thanksgiving weekend. Evidently someone had ordered it as a semi-custom and didn't like something about it. I maxed the credit card and bought it. I understand why people pick the Hunqapillar. When I put 650 x 41 Fatty Rumpkins on my Bombadil, it accelerates like road bike, but the bike can handle any load I throw at it. I have run it with drops and bullmoose bars. The Hunqapillar also has the best head badge of any Rivendell - love those trilobites. Laing On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 11:41:26 AM UTC-5 jcbrya...@gmail.com wrote: > Everyone choosing the Hunqapillar makes me mighty envious, especially > since those are long gone. To all the Hunq owners: what bike in Riv's > current catalog fills that role now? Is it the Appaloosa, their > heavier-duty road touring frame? Or is the Hunqapillar the genetic > precursor to the current iteration of the Atlantis? It looks to be a cool > bike that represents the transition between classic Riv geometry and the > more extreme long wheelbase swoopy bikes they're making now. Interesting to > see how the bikes and designs have evolved over time. > On Thursday, November 17, 2022 at 9:38:23 AM UTC-6 pi...@gmail.com wrote: > >> I'm a serious under-biker, so I'd probably pick a Roadini or A Homer >> Hilsen. For years I only owned a single road bike as my do-it-tall bike. >> My touring frame takes at most 32mm tires but I'd actually tour on 25mm >> tires. Everywhere I rode people would swear up and down that I needed a >> mountain bike to do certain rides I was planning on doing, and yet I'd >> manage to ride just fine. I finally ordered a pair of Continental >> TerraSpeed, and I'm going to look forward to tackling certain rides that >> I'd previously done on the mountain bike with a much ligher, more agile >> bike --- the Roadini. >> >> On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 1:35:25 PM UTC-8 Patrick Moore wrote: >> >>> The threads on Platypus versus [name] and using versus "saving" your >>> Rivendell raises an interesting if (fortunately!) academic question: if you >>> could have only 1 Rivendell as your only bicycle, and that Rivendell had to >>> serve all purposes -- fast pavement, commuting, errand loads, at least >>> light dirt and gravel: what model would you choose and how would you build >>> and equip it? >>> >>> I'm fortunate to have a bike for each of my purposes, except a >>> theft-be-damned but fun to ride grocery beater, which I hope to add to the >>> collection*, but if I had to choose just 1 and that a Riv, it would be my >>> gofast with a second set of wheels shod with 42 mm Naches Passes (which fit >>> with room to spare under the front normal reach single pivot) but not bolt >>> anything else to the Riv. Lights: I have an excellent B&M Ixon IQ Premium >>> which puts out at least as much brightness and has a nicer beam pattern >>> than my Edeluxe I, and Cateye clamps are cheap and easy to find. There are >>> all sorts of bright, strap-on blinkies for the rear. I'd rig up a QR for my >>> Saddlesack Medium and attach it with the Nitto standoff only as needed, and >>> augment it with a courier bag in 1 of 3 sizes. I'd get some clip-on, easy >>> on/off fenders, shorties if need be -- hell, this is New Mexico. >>> >>> Wheels: Actually, I might do as I did decades ago when I tried to make a >>> mountain bike do triple duty with 3 wheelsets: gofast with 23 mm tires and >>> 12-19 (7-sp) cassette, commuting with 35 mm tires with 13-21, and off road >>> with knobbies and 14-28. The Phil fixed/fixed with Elk Pass would keep the >>> 17/19 Dingle and the 28 mm Elk Passes, but I'd have another Elk Pass rear >>> for the TC fixed hub with 17 t cog for 76" direct and 66" underdrive; and >>> then I'd have a third wheeset for Naches Passes with the fixed TF hub with >>> a 19 t cog and the Naches Passes for 70" and 52"; good pavement-to-moderate >>> dirt ratios. >>> >>> Of course, I'd have to overcome the scruple of keeping this bike >>> pristine .... Funny, I usually take a brief detour for a mile or >>> mile-and-a-half along a very busy 6-lane when I ride North from my house >>> because the direct route is dusty, sandy crusher fine. Would have to >>> strenuously overcome that vice. >>> >>> * Actually, one reason for this 5th beater bike would be just the fun of >>> building up a bike that rides nice and meets my gearing and handling >>> preferences at the lowest possible price. >>> >>> -- >>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Patrick Moore >>> Alburquerque, Nuevo Mexico, Etats Unis d'Amerique, Orbis Terrarum >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/c1824954-88b7-4f47-80d8-9c14614ef638n%40googlegroups.com.
