On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:47 PM, R Gonet <richard.go...@earthlink.net> wrote: > > >> >> I personally think that "ain't" fills a huge gap in our language and ought >> to be encouraged; as, too, "y'all". Seriously. > > What are the gaps that they fill? I can see the utility of "ya'll", > though the apostrophe is a PITA, but "ain't" doesn't seem to fill a > need that I can tell.
She is, isn't she? They are, aren't they? We are, aren't we? You are, aren't you? They are, aren't they? I am, ____ I? -- -- Anne Paulson My hovercraft is full of eels -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
