A big jump in income and net worth comes in the top .5% and again at . 1%, where the money made isn't from 'work,' but from the working of money. I think the conflation of the 1% with the .1% makes it easy to argue at cross purposes. Graphs and charts from the hippie school I attended: http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html
Philip On Nov 11, 8:21 am, Jim Cloud <cloud...@aol.com> wrote: > According to the WSJ, the Adjusted Gross Income required to be in > America's top 1% (in 2008) was $380,354. If this is representative of > most Rivendell owners, I need to find another group because I'm > certainly not in the top 1%! > > Jim Cloud > Tucson, AZ > > On Nov 9, 7:08 pm, Bruce Herbitter <bruce.herbit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Most Riv owners probably fall in the 1%. But there is supposedly lots of > > free food, sex (some apparently non-consenusal) and drugs, at the Occupy > > festivities (courtesy of ACORN) so maybe they won't notice an upscale bike. > > If they do, expect it to be "redistributed." -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
