Jim,
Excellent!

If Jim Cyclofiend wasn't swamped I'd move that he add this to the Cyclofiend 
site.

On Jan 21, 2012, at 9:11 AM, James Warren wrote:

> 
> Now that's the kind of question we need on the list right now!
> 
> The Atlantis came about around 1999 as Rivendell's Japanese-built version of 
> their legendary All-rounder. The all-rounder is/was a bike-style designed to 
> work well in the following ways:
> 
> as a road bike for people not set on racing lightness or racing geometry. 
> as an offroad vehicle once you mount some wide tires, and the tire clearance 
> is wide. Grant would shoot for two inches, although the first Atlantis's in 
> 99 through 2001 only got to about 1.9.
> as an excellent touring bike
> and in other ways you can think of, because the bike is so versatile.
> 
> The versatility came through the very high clearances and cantilever brakes 
> which gave no problem mounting fenders and very wide tires. The bike has a 
> pretty long wheelbase and pretty long chainstays (although still shorter than 
> the 80's Trek 720's). It has a low bottom bracket which improves road 
> handling and invites larger tires, especially for offroad use. The other part 
> of the versatility is the rack braze-ons and really nice fender mounting 
> spots. In the earlier part of the 90's, one of the distinguishing features of 
> the all-rounder was basing it around 26 inch wheels. This came from the 
> Bridgestone days, when they were one of the few companies making "hybrids" 
> based around the more useful at the time 26 inch wheel size when offroading 
> is even considered. When Rivendell started, the All-rounder model would 
> continue this 26-inch wheel design, and that was one of the features that 
> made me want one then. But early in Rivendell's existence, they started not 
> liking the 26-inch wheels on the larger sizes, and began selling the larger 
> ones with 700c wheels and the smaller ones with 26 inch wheel. As a tall guy, 
> this bummed me out until I was convinced that in the late 90's, offroad 700c 
> tires, even 2-inch varieties, were beginning to blossom, mostly from WTB and 
> Schwalbe. 
> 
> In the late 90's, the all-rounder was a model made in the US and was fairly 
> expensive, and Grant wanted to make a version of it in Japan that would cost 
> less. This is where the Atlantis came from. It has those all-rounder 
> qualities described above, the big tire clearance, the great touring 
> behavior, the offroad capability, nice bike to ride unloaded for road rides. 
> It's an amazing bike, and it's still available as originally designed, only 
> now it has more rack braze-ons for added versatility (mini-racks and such). I 
> speak from experience regarding the Atlantis. I got mine in 2001, and it 
> really can do everything I would want to do riding. All my other bikes are 
> specialists in some specific cycling arena that the Atlantis can hold its 
> own: sporty road rides, cross-country mountain biking, commuting, sub-24-hour 
> overnighters, country biking with long days and mixed surfaces. What the 
> Atlantis excels at that the others can't match is touring rides that include 
> camping. 700c in the large sizes and 26 inch in the smaller sizes. Amazing 
> bike. One of the higher price Rivendell production models, but worth it. And 
> the 700c tire options are wonderful now. I don't long for 26ers much anymore. 
> Additionally, the Atlantis was ahead of the mainstream now so excited about 
> these modern "29ers!"
> 
> A Homer Hilsen:
> Perhaps without the All-rounder, the AHH could not have come about. Let's say 
> you never want to tour, you love country rides, you like to veer off-road, 
> you like to go overnight, just not days on end, you like to be comfortable 
> for a long day. You like to carry stuff on your bike, at least sometimes, and 
> you like road rides. But most importantly, in addition to all of the above, 
> you want to do most of it, including the road rides, on tires that are 
> between 32 mm and 40 mm, because you've discovered what an awesome size that 
> is, including for road rides. Also, because you like that tire width so much, 
> you don't want to scale the tire down just to mount a fender. If so, then the 
> A Homer Hilsen is the bike. Also, the A Homer Hilsen has a cool refinement: 
> dual pivot sidepulls work well and still provide the clearance needed to do 
> what's described above. 
> 
> Another way of describing what's above for the AHH is to say that it sort of 
> splits the difference between the Rivendell Atlantis and the Rivendell Road 
> model. So the AHH is a refinement of the all-rounder, moved closer to the 
> road end of the spectrum. Or maybe it's the other way around, because the 
> tubing of the AHH is lighter like the road models. The Atlantis uses more 
> sturdy tubes for its loaded duties and probably greater offroad duties.
> 
> The AHH probably tours for days on end better than many bikes that have been 
> taken for days-on-end touring by many people for the past 50 years.
> 
> I'll be that big-tire, fast road-biking is something that few people know 
> exists, and I'll bet the AHH is the best bike in the world at it. Also, 
> Rivendell calls the AHH a country bike. You should read Grant's description 
> of the term "country bike." I'll try to find it. If you take fully loaded 
> touring out of the equation (which could be valid, because it's a rare thing 
> to do), then I think the AHH is the most versatile and coolest bike ever made.
> 
> San Marcos:
> Rivendell has almost always had a road model available, a bike not designed 
> for heavy loads or too much offroad use (but with Rivendells, you can stretch 
> those rules even.) Rivendell road models have always had slightly longer 
> wheelbases than typical road bikes, and their comfort levels are extremely 
> high. You get handlebar position versatility (high included) and big tire 
> clearances. The production Rivendells for the road that came before the San 
> Marcos have been the Rambouillet, Romulus and the Roadeo. With the San Marcos 
> and the Roadeo, you can use 700x33 tires with fenders which I think is 
> extraordinary. If the main thing you want is a road bike, get one of these. 
> They are superb performers as road bikes and they are very comfortable and 
> versatile. The San Marcos is much less expensive than the Roadeo. You're not 
> supposed to load them too much, but listen: I have a Rambouillet and I 
> stretch the rules often. I put a rear rack on it and take it on overnighters. 
> I put Jack Browns on it (700x33) and veer offroad sometimes. If I had to 
> knock the whole bike collection down to 1, on paper and for 
> practicality/versatility, that one should probably be the Atlantis. But even 
> still, in the end I'd have a hard time not picking the Rambouillet. I don't 
> know what the San Marcos rides like, but I'm guessing it is similar. 
> Rivendell road models are amazing. Also, some people (brilliant people who 
> know their stuff by the way) will tell you that the optimum tire size for 
> these models is 700x28. They are probably right, but for me, ever since I put 
> Jack Brown greens, 700x33, on my Rambouillet, I have vowed not to take them 
> off, the ride is so wonderful (and I think fast).
> 
> And remember my friends, it is better to feel fast than to be fast.
> 
> -Jim 
> 
> 
> On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:58 PM, Mike Goldsworthy wrote:
> 
>> i'll take a look at it. thanks!
>> 
>> what's the difference between the san marcos, AHH and Atlantis?
>> 
>> On Jan 20, 2012, at 4:15 PM, DustyMerkin wrote:
>> 
>>> Have you looked at the Soma San Marcos, the 54cm does not have the 2TT but 
>>> I believe the geometry is similar to the 56cm but not sure.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/p8xMS9KuPU0J.
>>> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to