Sorry man. I love you, so I tell you the truth. It looks bent. :( At least one person told me that he agreed with me. I'm sure it's fine to use.
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 6:07:11 PM UTC-7, Amit Singh wrote: > > Bubba !!! Why'd you drop this idea in my mind?! > > Here's another photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/amisingh/7983927516/ > > Can someone else tell me the fork is perfect and not to worry about it? > GP, you'd be the supreme authority here, of course. > > So ... what are the implications if a fork is not perfect? This bicycle > tracks perfect no hands, anything else to worry about? > > Amit > > On Thursday, 13 September 2012 18:51:39 UTC-4, William wrote: >> >> I hope that's just a photo illusion but the forks look bent. The upper >> fork legs are not parallel with the headtube, in the photo. Maybe in real >> life they are. Careful! >> >> On Thursday, September 13, 2012 7:07:58 AM UTC-7, Amit Singh wrote: >>> >>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/amisingh/7980699538/ >>> >>> Another Bombadil w/ 60mm tires and fenders. >>> >>> Converted from mountain bike to touring bike duty for my upcoming C&O >>> Canal / Allegheny Passage tour. >>> >>> Excited! >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/UR4-MpDtbuEJ. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
