Thanks Tom. I agree that the hammered Honjos are super swank. The target bike in question is that Stumpjumper Sport conversion I did a couple months back. I've got my heart set on smooooooth fenders for that bike, like the chrome bumper on a 1950's Cadillac. The thing is heavy as-is, so I'll go steel.
On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 12:24:58 PM UTC-8, Pudge wrote: > > Bill: Yes on durability for SS, but they’re also pretty light, so the > advantage in durability isn’t very costly in terms of extra grams. IMO, > nothing beats the appearance of those hammered Honjos, though. T > > > > *From:* rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> [mailto: > rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>] *On Behalf Of *William > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 11, 2012 3:20 PM > *To:* rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> > *Subject:* [RBW] Metal fender coinflip: Stainless or Aluminum? > > > > I'm in the market for some metal fenders. If you could get a particular > model of fender for the same price with the same hardware in Stainless > Steel or Aluminum, which would you want? Is it Stainless for durability > and Aluminum for light weight? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/kwa_tcTFlsQJ. > To post to this group, send email to rbw-own...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > **************************************************** > > To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we advise you > that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice > contained in this message was not intended or written to be used, and > cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under > the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions > or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any > tax-related matters addressed herein. > **************************************************** > **************************************************** > > This email (and any attachments thereto) is intended only for use by the > addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or > confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this > email, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or > copying of this email (and any attachments thereto) is strictly prohibited. > If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (212) > 735-3000 and permanently delete the original email (and any copy of any > email) and any printout thereof. > > Further information about the firm, a list of the Partners and their > professional qualifications will be provided upon request. > **************************************************** > ============================================================================== > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/KSEGvfKzIa0J. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
