I am in roughly the same boat. Sure is a pretty bike tho...too many nice bikes out there, too few dollars here!
Steve, East Lansing, MI On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Joe Bernard <joerem...@gmail.com> wrote: > Of course the saddle height works perfect for me. But it's not gonna happen. > I need a triple drivetrain for trails and the hills around my house, and the > dropbars would be ditched for a Bullmoose I already have. I'd need to score > it as a frameset the way he did, which is the only way I could possibly > afford it, anyway. Buh bye. > > Joe Bernard > > On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 7:44:03 PM UTC-8, Chris wrote: >> >> Ah damn, just as well... >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Dec 12, 2012, at 6:38 PM, "Benz, Sunnyvale, CA" <benzo...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> The bike is currently set up for a saddle height of 70.6 cm. Yes, I asked >> because (darn it!) it looks to be my size. >> >> A PBH of 88.9 cm should have a saddle height of closer to 80 cm, maybe 78 >> or 79cm. That's an extra 3" of seatpost, which means you'll need to raise >> the handlebar a similar amount (if you want to keep the same drop). So it >> appears to be way too small. >> >> Actually, on second thoughts, it's your size. Buy it! Relieve me of the >> temptation and ultimately my extended stay in the doghouse! >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 8:56:28 AM UTC-8, Chris wrote: >>> >>> Oh this is great. I have a PBH of 88.9. Is this frame too small for me? >>> >>> On Monday, December 10, 2012 12:24:01 PM UTC-8, Mojo wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rivendell-All-Rounder-Excellent-Condition-/221164983311?_trksid=p5197.m1992&_trkparms=aid%3D111000%26algo%3DREC.CURRENT%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D14%26meid%3D4061894373677924007%26pid%3D100015%26prg%3D1006%26rk%3D2%26sd%3D251197730711%26 >>>> >>>> Not mine and I am not associated. Someone here? It's lovely with good to >>>> excellent components, but the time-built seems wrong. My late 1995 built >>>> All-Rounder has less ornate lugs and a flat top tube. Were the lugs seen >>>> here and the rising top tube being used in 1996 or 97? >>>> >>>> Ah, really who cares. What a great looking bike. Needs fenders though. >>>> It is priced its worth I think; not a bargain but not gouging. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "RBW Owners Bunch" group. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/QUg1-OK2GgsJ. >> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/QY6F_JUZ-lYJ. > To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
