Hello,

On top of exposing C++ functions (see http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.rcpp/354), I've added some code to expose c++ classes to the R level. This is also inspired from boost.python (although much less comprehensive).


Consider this simple c++ class :

class World {
public:
    World() : msg("hello"){}
    void set(std::string msg) { this->msg = msg; }
    std::string greet() { return msg; }

private:
    std::string msg;
};



Using Rcpp modules, you can expose it to R, at the expense of this piece of code:

RCPP_MODULE(yada){
        using namespace Rcpp ;
        
        class_<World>( "World" )
                .method( "greet", &World::greet )
                .method( "set", &World::set )
        ;
}


This creates an Rcpp module called "yada" that exposes the "World" class to R. On the R side, you then grab the module and extract the class :


yada <- Rcpp:::Module( "yada", getDynLib( fx ) )
World <- yada$World

And then you can create instances of World using the new function in R:

w <- new( World )

And then call methods :

> w$greet()
[1] "hello"

> w$set( "hello world" )

> w$greet()
[1] "hello world"


This is probably the craziest c++ code I've ever written, but using it is easy.



There are many things boost.python does and Rcpp modules does not.

- For now -- until I find a way -- new uses the default constructor. Boost.Python allows other constructors to be exposed, but I'm not sure how to achieve this.

- no polymorphism. methods are stored in a map, so if you give the same name to two c++ functions, the second one will win.

- currently limited to member functions of the target class, e.g. see the second argument: &World::greet, etc ... I am planning to add the possibility (should be easy) to attach regular functions which take a
pointer to Foo or a reference to Foo.

- inputs and outputs still need to follow the rules of the last email. output type can be void or whatever type that Rcpp::wrap is happy with. input types can be void or whatever sequence of types (up to 65 arguments) Rcpp::as is happy with.

- currently no support for fields or properties.


The most obvious client to this will be the RProtoBuf package, it already had quiet a diet when we introduced the RCPP_FUNCTION_, etc .. macros, but with this the code is likely to get more simple and more robust.


Have fun.


Romain

--
Romain Francois
Professional R Enthusiast
+33(0) 6 28 91 30 30
http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr
|- http://bit.ly/cork4b : highlight 0.1-8
|- http://bit.ly/bklUXt : RcppArmadillo 0.2.1
`- http://bit.ly/936ck2 : Rcpp 0.8.0

_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel

Reply via email to