On 10 June 2010 at 10:35, Vinh Nguyen wrote:
| Thanks Dirk. I've been using the package skeleton method, and added
| PKG_CXXFLAGS = $(shell $(R_HOME)/bin/Rscript -e "Rcpp:::CxxFlags()" )
| $(shell Rscript -e "cat( '-I',
| system.file('include', package = 'RcppArmadillo'), sep = '' )" )
|
| into the Makevars file per Romain's suggestion.
| RcppArmadillo:::CxxFlags() is going to help.
|
| Maybe I'm not seeing this, but will you guys implement the above into
| Rcpp.package.skeleton()? I don't think it is currently implemented
| (correct me if I'm wrong). Once that's available developing/debugging
| code the R CMD SHLIB is quite easy once the Makevars file is
| generated.
I do not understand your question. Can you try to restate it more carefully?
>From what I gather:
-- you care about the Rcpp and Armadillo intersection, ie RcppArmadillo
-- you had rightly obsevered that (up until and including RcppArmadillo 0.2.1)
one could use RcppArmadillo with inline (as inline would pull Rcpp.h
leading it to be included before other headers)
-- we pointed you to alternative methods, notably using a package
-- you still seem to using some mashup of methods; Romain and I don't so
you to tell us more clearly a) what you do and b) what doesn't work
-- as far as I can tell RcppArmadillo 0.2.2 should help you, your post
does in no way indicate whether you looked at it
-- Rcpp.package.skeleton() does not know and will not know about
RcppArmadillo; it is higher the foodchain
-- Which is why RcppArmadillo has its own skeleton generator.
| Thanks for an awesome package! I can go into C++ and do crazy loops
| with near ease as if I was in R.
Cool. That is one of the goals. Glad it helps you.
--
Regards, Dirk
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
