Dominick, wtf? Rcpp is on one of the most rapid development cycles that I've ever seen. If you want stability, then why don't you wait about six more months before you start using Rcpp in your projects.
Alternatively, you can easily center your package on a particular version by enclosing your preferred version of Rcpp inside of your package. git submodules make this task particularly easy: http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html#submodules. We c++ users are very lucky that Romain and Dirk are making it so easy to use c++ within R. Please don't lose sight of the larger picture because a few builds break every now and then. -Whit On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Dominick Samperi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Romain Francois <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> no. see this in about every single file: >> >> // Rcpp is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but >> // WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of >> // MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the >> // GNU General Public License for more details. > > OK, then Dirk should not make false promises that give potential > clients a false sense that you will actually behave responsibly. > > > _______________________________________________ > Rcpp-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel > > _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
