> You can always attach dimensions later: > > ret.attr( "dim" ) = Dimension( 2, 2, 2) ;
Ah, yes. Thanks. > You can however Rcpp::wrap a cube. It is safer because the memory gets > copied, but less efficient, because the memory is copied. Got it. I erroneously assumed an implicit wrap somewhere. > Sure. I need to think a little bit more about how to do Rcpp::Array, etc ... > because an Array could have an arbitrary number of dimensions. > Perhaps embedding information into the class would work. > > // make an array of 3 dimensions, etc ... > Rcpp::Array<3> ret( y ) ; Yes, I've been thinking similarly about an Indexer class. Accounting for a variable number of dimensions looks unpleasantly messy. >> * What about "ret = ret * as<int>(x);" causes ret to lose it's dimension? > > Omission, lack of time, I'm not using arrays all that much personally, etc Oh, I was thinking more along the lines of "by what mechanism is dimension lost" than "why is grass green" :) -Christian -- A man, a plan, a cat, a ham, a yak, a yam, a hat, a canal – Panama! _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
