Yes, I have concluded that I will be using RcppArmadillo - I have noticed that it is easier to use after read the RcppGSL vignette.
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 14 October 2011 at 16:51, Slava Razbash wrote: > | I been planning to use RcppArmadillo to code packages intended for > | release on CRAN. Following this discussion, it seems that I should > | switch to RcppGSL because it does not have this function that causes > | problems when compiling on Mac. > > No, I may have been overzealous. After all, RcppArmadillo builds and so do > the eight packages already depending on it (start here at long at per-package > build results incl OS X: > http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RcppArmadillo/index.html > > It is true that OS X is stuck at g++ 4.2.1 but both Conrad (for Armadillo) > and us (for RcppArmadillo) have so far managed to code around the > restriction. > > So as Conrad wrote to me and Terrance in off-list email, this may "just" be a > matter of an older Armadillo library being on the machine where Terrance > tried this. I can't test this on OS X for lack of a machine. > > Lastly, RcppGSL is a proof of concept with a much worse interface. If you > can, use RcppArmadillo for your projects. > > Dirk > > -- > "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it is too > dark to read." -- Groucho Marx > _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
