>Don't take this the wrong way, but we are not here to debug or rewrite your >code for you.
Thanks Dirk, but i'm not asking for this either. The code works....only it doesn't time the same. My question is: is it normal -- is there an overhead in using rcpp and how large is it, typically? I'm was not even so enclined to post my code --my question is more general. Best, > >On 11 March 2012 at 01:05, Kaveh Vakili wrote: >| Hi Steve, >| >| Timing: >| >| i use: >| >| int start_s=clock(); >| .. >| .. >| int stop_s=clock(); >| cout << "time: " << (stop_s-start_s)/double(CLOCKS_PER_SEC)*1000 << endl; > >Don't take this the wrong way, but we are not here to debug or rewrite your >code for you. > >Read the list archive. There is a well-established posting standard of using >the CRAN packages inline (to prepare small, self-contained examples) and >rbenchmark (for timing and comparison). > >You expect a free service here. Allow us to expect you to at least conform >to the list standards before we spend our "copious free time" on your problem. > > >Thanks, Dirk > > >-- >"Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it is too >dark to read." -- Groucho Marx > > _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
