Le 17/11/12 14:42, Hadley Wickham a écrit :
Hi all,

I've included what seems to be a simple application of Rcpp sugar
below, but I'm getting some very strange results.  Any help would be
much appreciate!

Thanks,

Hadley

library(Rcpp)
library(microbenchmark)

# Compute distance between single point and vector of points
pdist1 <- function(x, ys) {
   (x - ys) ^ 2
}

cppFunction('
   NumericVector pdist2(double x, NumericVector ys) {
     int n = ys.size();
     NumericVector out(n);

     for(int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
       out[i] = pow(ys[i] - x, 2);
     }
     return out;
   }
')

ys <- runif(1e4)
all.equal(pdist1(0.5, ys), pdist2(0.5, ys))

library(microbenchmark)
microbenchmark(
   pdist1(0.5, ys),
   pdist2(0.5, ys)
)
# C++ version about twice as fast, presumably because it avoids a
# complete vector allocation.


# Sugar version:
cppFunction('
   NumericVector pdist3(double x, NumericVector ys) {
     return pow((x - ys), 2);
   }
')
all.equal(pdist1(0.5, ys), pdist3(0.5, ys))

microbenchmark(
   pdist1(0.5, ys),
   pdist2(0.5, ys),
   pdist3(0.5, ys)
)
# 10-fold slower??  Maybe it's because I'm using a double instead of
# a numeric vector?

That's weird. Not sure where the ineffiency is. Some hunting.
My guess is that sugar pow needs a refresh.

cppFunction('
   NumericVector pdist4(NumericVector x, NumericVector ys) {
     return pow((x - ys), 2);
   }
')
all.equal(pdist1(0.5, ys), pdist4(0.5, ys))

# Is this a bug in sugar? Should recycle to length of longest vector.
# Let's try flipping the order of operations:

There's no recycling. We pick the size of "x" and consider that y is of the same length. Something worth mentionning in documentation. Recycling would add some expense.

cppFunction('
   NumericVector pdist5(NumericVector x, NumericVector ys) {
     return pow((ys - x), 2);
   }
')
all.equal(pdist1(0.5, ys), pdist5(0.5, ys))
# Where are the missing values coming from??

Same here. We pick the length of ys (the lhs of the binary operation).

Both pdist4 and pdist5 are undeterminate behaviour.


I would prefer to keep it that way and document it that vector should have the same size, ... rather than introduce the extra cost of recyling.



--
Romain Francois
Professional R Enthusiast
+33(0) 6 28 91 30 30

R Graph Gallery: http://gallery.r-enthusiasts.com
`- http://bit.ly/SweN1Z : SuperStorm Sandy

blog:            http://romainfrancois.blog.free.fr
|- http://bit.ly/RE6sYH : OOP with Rcpp modules
`- http://bit.ly/Thw7IK : Rcpp modules more flexible

_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel

Reply via email to