Thank you. I'll send you unit tests for both "as" and "const ctor". 

Davor 

On 2013-02-10, at 6:06 AM, Romain Francois <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Right. I see what you mean. If it does bot disturbe anything else, i should 
> be able to bring it back. 
> 
> Romain
> 
> 
> Le 10 févr. 2013 à 04:54, Davor Cubranic <[email protected]> a écrit :
> 
>> On 13-02-09 05:06 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 8 February 2013 at 20:58, Davor Cubranic wrote:
>>>> That fixed just the runtime fault in "as", right? Or did it somehow
>>>> also take care of ctor for const string from an element of const
>>>> CharacterVector?
>>> 
>>> Variants with 'const CharacterVector' still fail. That would involve
>>> a lot more work to extend as<> to permit them.
>> 
>> I didn't mean "const as<>", but a const version of 
>> CharacterVector::operator[] that can be used in a const string's 
>> constructor, as it did before 0.10.1.
>> 
>> Davor
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rcpp-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel

Reply via email to