Thanks for the reply and great libraries Conrad and Romain.

Conrad, my example is a bit too simple maybe, I am really doing:

for i from 1 to m:
   do computation
   store a row of results into a tall m x n matrix

...where i am pretty sure that the time required for computation is more
than storing the results.

Out of curiosity, I tried to do some profiling for row filling of tall
Armadillo matrices vs. column filling. Row filling becomes worse when the
rows are long.  I guess the memory allocation could obscure some speed
differences:

library(Rcpp)
library(inline)

# fill a matrix by row with m0 rows and n0 columns
row.code <- '
   int m = Rcpp::as<int>(m0);
   int n = Rcpp::as<int>(n0);
   arma::mat mat = arma::zeros(m,n);
   arma::rowvec vec = Rcpp::as<arma::rowvec>(vec0);
   for (int i = 0; i < m; i++) {
      mat.row(i) = vec;
   }
   return Rcpp::wrap(mat);
'
row.f <-
cxxfunction(signature(m0="integer",n0="integer",vec0="numeric"),row.code,plugin="RcppArmadillo")

# so here we swap, fill by column, m0 is the number of columns and n0 is
the number of rows
col.code <- '
   int m = Rcpp::as<int>(m0);
   int n = Rcpp::as<int>(n0);
   arma::mat mat = arma::zeros(n,m);
   arma::colvec vec = Rcpp::as<arma::colvec>(vec0);
   for (int i = 0; i < m; i++) {
      mat.col(i) = vec;
   }
   return Rcpp::wrap(mat);
'
col.f <- cxxfunction(signature(m0="
integer",n0="integer",vec0="numeric"),col.code,plugin="RcppArmadillo")

> m <- 1e7
> n <- 10
> vec0 <- seq_len(n)
> system.time({row.f(m,n,vec0)})
   user  system elapsed
  0.779   1.022   1.801
> system.time({col.f(m,n,vec0)})
   user  system elapsed
  0.957   0.966   1.922
> all.equal(row.f(m,n,vec0), t(col.f(m,n,vec0)))
[1] TRUE

> m <- 1e6
> n <- 100
> vec0 <- seq_len(n)
> system.time({row.f(m,n,vec0)})
   user  system elapsed
  1.925   1.425   3.351
> system.time({col.f(m,n,vec0)})
   user  system elapsed
  1.244   1.423   2.667
> all.equal(row.f(m,n,vec0), t(col.f(m,n,vec0)))
[1] TRUE


On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Conrad S <conradsand.a...@gmail.com> wrote:

> There's an even simpler way when using Armadillo, so that no loop is
> required:
> http://arma.sourceforge.net/docs.html#each_colrow
>
> For example:
>
> mat X(4,5);
> rowvec r(5);
>
> X.each_row() = r;
>
>
> (btw, in general it's more efficient to access matrices as columns
> rather than rows).
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Michael Love
> <michaelisaiahl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > As recommended, I have switched to using Armadillo matrices, which
> doesn't
> > print out these lines.
> > ...
> > Example with Armadillo:
> >
> > arma.code <- '
> >    arma::mat mat = Rcpp::as<arma::mat>(mat0);
> >    arma::rowvec vec = Rcpp::as<arma::rowvec>(vec0);
> >    for (int i = 0; i < mat.n_rows; i++) {
> >       mat.row(i) = vec;
> >    }
> >    return Rcpp::wrap(mat);
> > '
> > arma.f <-
> >
> cxxfunction(signature(mat0="numeric",vec0="numeric"),arma.code,plugin="RcppArmadillo")
> > arma.f(mat0,vec0)
>
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel

Reply via email to