On 10 October 2013 at 02:56, Romain Francois wrote: | Le 10/10/13 02:41, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit : | > | > (Combining two of your emails) | > | > On 10 October 2013 at 01:08, Romain Francois wrote: | > | RcppGSL does not export its LdFlags, if it did, you'd see the warning | > | when you load it. | > | > Good catch ... but turns out I don't (to my surprise). | | Yes; My mistake. almost 3 am here :/
Understood. But also -- "this may yet be different": For RcppGSL, CFlags() and LdFlags() export the -I... and -L... -l... values for _the GNU GSL_ and not for us. I think I once wrote that to help package mvabund which of course still doesn't use it (and still uses a bunch of should-be-replaced fragments, but heck, not my package). So nothing actually used this until ... I got RcppZiggurat version 0.0.1 onto CRAN on Sunday. So I can say with a straight face that the functions are used on CRAN (and made linking to the GSL a total breeze, incl Windows builds via win-builder etc). | > | Why would you import Rcpp's LdFlags inside RcppGSL's namespace, you | > | don't use it there. | > | > R CMD check did complain, I guess it must grep for src/ to find it in | > Makevars. Once I imported the complaint went away. | | If this fixes something for you, that's fine. I just don't get why you | would import something you don't use. To make R CMD check happy, mostly. As I said in this thread. I was quite fine with how we use ':::' here. "They were not." So I cope and adapt. | What makes sense to me now is both Rcpp and RcppGSL exporting their own | LdFlags. Having RcppGSL import the one from Rcpp makes no sense to me. | But if it makes R CMD check happy. It's all pretty odd, see above. Now: does dplyrRcpp actually export its library? Who would link against it? | Soon they are going to rename it R CMD ChuckNorris Saw your tweet. Quite. | > Generally speaking, and as I understand recent r-devel threads, Imports: and | > importFrom(...) is how we are supposed to work with NAMESPACEs now. That is | > also what I did here, and what you roundly mocked one email ago (see above). | | I'm sorry you preceived mockery. Well, that's how your tone comes across a lot lately over on my end. But then neither one of us is a native speaker in the language we use to communicate, so their may be some loss in the signal. Dirk -- Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
