Le 19 juin 2014 à 00:30, Tim Keitt <tke...@utexas.edu> a écrit : > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Romain Francois <rom...@r-enthusiasts.com> > wrote: > Le 19 juin 2014 à 00:15, Tim Keitt <tke...@utexas.edu> a écrit : > > >> >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Romain Francois <rom...@r-enthusiasts.com> >> wrote: >> Le 18 juin 2014 à 23:54, Tim Keitt <tke...@utexas.edu> a écrit : >> >> >>> I'd like to raise a condition other than error or warning. Is that possible >>> using the Rcpp api? I assume this can be done via R internals, but I'd >>> prefer not to call error() directly (or is that the recommendation?). >>> >>> THK >> >> Definitely not. Rf_error should really only be called from C code. If you >> call it from C++, there is a great chance you'll lose determinism as >> destructors for your c++ objects are very likely not to be called. Most of >> the time, it will just mean you'll never release some objects to the garbage >> collector, but it could also get you leaks or other nice stuff depending on >> what your destructors were supposed to do and did not get a chance to do. >> >> That was my understanding. Just wanted to be sure it was still the case. >> >> >> I'm not sure Rcpp has a way to raise an R condition apart from calling stop, >> which usually is good enough. Otherwise, you can borrow from Rcpp11 and >> adapt some code from >> https://github.com/Rcpp11/Rcpp11/blob/450aade7338c16c34618ad0916003e8ca4fb58a6/inst/include/Rcpp/Condition.h >> >> Ah. I see. Eval "stop" in the global env with the condition as the argument. >> Clever. > > It is more of a hack due to lack of proper api from R. > > If you do this, make sure you don't have any c++ object in scope. Essentially > that means you would evaluate `stop( condition )` in a top level catch block. > > Rcpp objects are I assume ok however.
Depends what you mean by "ok". If you mean objects like NumericVector, ... their destructor is responsible for calling R_ReleaseObject, i.e. let go of the protection that was set by their constructor. If the destructor is not called because R error handling does a long jump, you will get objects forever protected. So things will seemingly work, until you exhaust the memory. > I will try "signalCondition" and see what happens. > > THK
_______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
