I agree the issue is moot and resulted from my own confusion. I just wanted to make things perfectly clear - I have never, nor do I intend to distribute. My work with R, Rcpp, etc, is internal use only.
I think we can drop this now. Dale Smith, Ph.D. Senior Financial Quantitative Analyst Financial & Risk Management Solutions Fiserv Office: 678-375-5315 www.fiserv.com FORTUNE® Magazine's 2014 World's Most Admired Companies Facebook: Like Fiserv · Twitter: Follow @Fiserv · LinkedIn: Connect Fiserv . Careers: Join Fiserv Fiserv What's Next NowSM Campaign -----Original Message----- From: Dirk Eddelbuettel [mailto:e...@debian.org] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 10:38 AM To: Smith, Dale (Norcross) Cc: Dirk Eddelbuettel; Christian Authmann; rcpp-de...@r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at Subject: RE: [Rcpp-devel] Review request: Sandboxed R integration via RInside On 20 November 2014 at 15:25, Smith, Dale (Norcross) wrote: | I never distributed my work and don't now. Same with what I do at work (as opposed to what I do as a private person in the Open Source commons). And I don't talk about what I do at work either. So your entire point of what _Christian_ does with his code is really moot. You can use it at work either way. We are simply trying to figure what is "right" and useful for all us. And to me "right" for such tight coupling is using the same license as the much larger body of work that is R itself. Copyleft is a good thing for me. YMMV. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
