Jordi, On 22 September 2018 at 09:18, Georgi Boshnakov wrote: | I don’t see any code going with the revised version, but | looking at the code coming with the original paper, see http://economics.sas.upenn.edu/~jesusfv/RBC_codes.zip, | the following points come up:
All excellent points. Jordi, you should ask for the code. It really sounds like something done either naively, or with a goal in mind. "Rcpp code is C++ code" so any "N times" is silly -- setup costs, extra copies, ... etc pp. We may of course copy at the end from, say, bespoke C++ data structures to ours. But for any non-trivial example the cost of that will be well under, say, 1% while still getting a "many times" speedup over alternative R solutions. So a win for most people. Hence 1444 packages on CRAN using it. Those people aren't all fools ... Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
